Another cartoon that offends. By now, I am sure everyone realises that cartoons that are
derogatory to religious symbols lead to an international backlash. Specially if the symbol is
islamic. Now France is spending a lot of euros to beef up security in its embassies. So why
could the cartoonist not desist? He/she knows that publishing the cartoon would lead to
expensive security measures- spending his/her own tax euros which could have been used
for beefing up their public schools or medicare or whatever. It may also lead to some acts
of violence and some poor innocent person may get killed or hurt-- mind you, the artist will
get adequate protection.
Let us not even think of the higher moral value of tolerance for all religions, let us only
look at it from self interest-
Not publishing it is not going to harm anyone's interest. So why this compulsion to take
protection under the freedom of expression and write or draw something that is so
expensive to his/her own society?
I can understand publishing something - however offensive- that uncovers some truth that
needs to be revealed, something that is important. But this kind of self indulgence is difficult to understand.